Virgin's Guide to Burning Man

A Virgin's Guide to Burning Man can be found here.

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Happy for No Reason

Yesterday, while running errands, I tuned into a segment on NPR where Marci Shimoff, author of Happy for No Reason, was giving an interview based on her research into happiness. I only caught a brief snippet of the interview, but what stood out to me was that she said everybody has a happiness quotient. This is the baseline ratio or number of how happy a person is, regardless of circumstance. You could win the lottery and within a year, you'd return to this baseline number.

This happiness quotient is about 50% genetic, but the rest of it is largely up to individual choice: how one chooses to view the world and respond to it. True happiness has nothing to do with what happens to you, what things you have in your life or what things you don't have. That happiness is superficial and fleeting. True happiness comes from what you give out. So for example, one of the things she said is that being loved is not a cause for true happiness. But giving out love, in gratitude, forgiveness, doing for others, caring for others...that's what brings true happiness. She quoted a Chinese proverb:

"If there is light in the soul, there will be beauty in the person. If there is beauty in the person, there will be harmony in the house. If there is harmony in the house, there will be order in the nation. If there is order in the nation, there will be peace in the world."

It seemed from what I caught in the interview that much of what she said was based on scientific research, though when I went to her website, it seemed very commercialized, with very little mention of data or credentials. So that makes me a little skeptical. But what she says has a lot of face validity to me - it sounds logical and true on it's face. It certainly reflects my own particular perspective and experience in the world.

What really struck me was the notion that people have a baseline happiness quotient regardless of circumstance-and that that happiness level has an affect on the people around you. I have known people whose mere presence in a room can either brighten it, or suck all the energy out of it.

There is a very remarkable difference between happy people who fall on hard times, and truly sad or angry people. Even if the hard times are lasting for happy people, and they turn to others for support, it is never an encumbrance to help them and be there for them. But people who are naturally more negative can be intensely draining to be around, even when they are in a decent mood. With them, there is always a problem, always a drama, and in my experience, they always find passive aggressive ways to let you know they're upset. And while I have been known to be passive aggressive when I was younger, once I got old enough to really see what I was doing, I worked hard to recognize and change that about myself because I can't stand passive aggressiveness. It's weak and ultimately harmful because: 1) it makes solving the problem infinitely more difficult because you're never dealing with the real issue, only smoke and mirrors and symptoms of the issue, 2) the passive-aggressor is only punishing everybody else for the unhappiness they feel, instead of ponying up to their own responsibility, and 3) the passive-aggressor gets to pretend they're the victim, they're misunderstood or unappreciated. They're so good at pretending this, they can't see past their own bullshit. They martyr themselves for others and resent it all the while.

But I digress. You can see this is a pet peeve of mine.

I don't know if Shimoff's argument is appealing because it contains both an ability to blame unhappiness on something over which we have no control, and an element where we can tell ourselves we can change how we feel-that we do have choice and control. We can tell ourselves, "I'm not to blame, but I have the freedom to change if I want." It's the epitome of American dogma, isn't it? I have long believed that happiness comes from how you choose to respond to the hand life deals you, but maybe we are predisposed-whether through nature or nurture-to be more optimistic or pessimistic. But I do know, of the unhappy people I've known, some could benefit from a healthy dose of gratitude for what others do for them and the others could do with a little bit of forgiveness.

But then, perhaps, they don't want to be happy. This is something else I have observed: some people are actually genuinely and perfectly content to wallow in a cocoon of self-pity.

4 comments:

  1. We all have the thing that drives us crazy about others. I have a long list actually. I should get up the courage to say what I think about these things. My way might be a bit more passive aggressive. For example, I might say that I love something a certain way. One could infer properly that the other side of the coin isn't very well tolerated.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It does take a bit of gumption to speak up about problems - gumption I don't always have. But the specific brand of passive aggressiveness I don't like is when people pretend one thing when they really mean another (which I think is different from what I think you're saying that you do).
    For example, if someone wants to go to sushi for dinner, and the other says they prefer Italian, and the first person SAYS "Ok, fine whatever you want" - but what they MEAN is, "if you choose what you want instead of what I want I'm going to be angry and feel unloved and I'll punish you with the silent treatment the whole evening to make you realize you chose the wrong option."

    ReplyDelete
  3. Well, the example you gave I would never give a passive aggressive response to. I would gladly go to any restaurant I didn't like. I just might have to drink instead of eat :)
    coffee/wine depending on the time of the day ;)

    I think your post is very good. The more I thought about it there is someone in my life who is the victim and never happy. This person just so happens to have a lot of power in my life. It's frustrating because she will make others the bad guy. I immediately noticed what she was about and told the other parties I won't be falling into her emotional game any time soon.

    In any case, you made some very good points.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Passive aggressive people can be very emotionally powerful. Though I'm sure it's difficult (especially if this person is close to you), I think it's great that you've decided to stand up to her games because that is the only way to stop them from doing what they do, at least to you. They deal in lies, deception, and prey on guilt feelings, and the only way to avoid it is to call them on their BS (or at least trust your instincts that it is BS and not be swayed by it) and deal in the the language of reality. For example, if they clearly are upset, and when you ask what's wrong, and they say "Oh nothing" then say "Oh ok." and leave it at that. It denies them the attention they want until they can learn to say honestly how they feel; they need to learn to speak honestly in order to get the real response they want. Truly healthy relationships rely heavily on honest and open communication, and passive aggressives make it nearly impossible to do that.

    This website provides pretty good information on emotional manipulation: http://www.cassiopaea.com/cassiopaea/emotional_manipulation.htm

    I hope you find that helpful!

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.